National Geographic just published a front page article this week honoring a nine-year-old boy who “feels” he is a girl and as a result chooses to dress like one, act like one and claim he is one (a girl that is). Therefore National Geographic implies in this article that he should be accepted as one. Can Nat Geo deny this when scrawled accross the page is the statment “Gender Revolution?”
According to the implications of Nat Geo’s article this transvestite child is a model of a universal truth we mindless average Americans are missing. The truth being whatever Nat Geo and other extreme Hollywood dementia types are sharing at the moment. How can they claim this? Easy, because there is no God, there are no values, and everything is morally relative, as overpaid pathetic liberal professors now teach your children in college.
It appears to me, from their article, that they are telling us that just like Bruce Jenner, who claims “I am the new normal,” this child, a nine-year-old named Avery, is the new normal. We average Americans on the other hand are mentally unable to grasp that fact; but, they have hopes that we will learn from Nat Geo and their generous and patient education program beginning with this “revolutionary” publication.
The attack against Judeo-Christian American Boundaries And Values goes on and on! Just remember when you say “we should all love and accept this transvestite” that it may be Christian to love all but not mandatory to accept all. Just as liberal extremists gave their children awards for showing up and not achievement, giving awards for sexual identity confusion makes no sense and that is what this article is about!
Somewhere in this confusing world we must have common boundaries and values as Americans or we are meaningless as a people. The attack on Judeo-Christian values is growing by the moment. Maybe we should not just let California seceded from the union but vote to expel them from the Union (or at least Hollywood and its sympathizers).
I for one (and with a HUGE majority of Americans) believe that women are beautiful and special. I don’t want that boundary, that distinction, that beauty, destroyed by people who think that pink worn by women is forced mind control!
What does Nat Geo have to say about this? “Surely we can support kids to be whoever they want to be and dress however they like without further reinforcing sexist stereotypes…”
No Meghan Murphy and the rest of you pathetics at Nat Geo, we do not have to support everything or anything YOU think is Okay.
I saw a proud selfie photo of two young Turkish boys holding bloody dog’s ears they had just cut off. The suffering animal sat chained below.
Surely you can support kids whoever they want to be….. invite these young people to stay at your home…don’t lock the silverware drawer and sleep well!
Meghan Murphy, the author of this article, “The Gender Revolution” therefore ends her great lesson to us ignorant -value prone conservatives by telling us that we are hurting children by expressing —-
S E X I S T S T E R E O T Y P E S !
Yes expecting a women to look and dress female and a man to look and dress male is a Sexist Stereotype, according to Nat Geo and Meghan. Tell this to Avon, Revlon, Mary Kay, Maybelline, Maybelline, Estée lauder, CoverGirl, Clinique, Elizabeth Arden ….. Oddly enough they have been marketing for and singing the praises of Female Beauty, clothing and style for a very long time! Are they all guilty of Sexist Stereotyping? Are the designers such as Coco Chanel, Donna Karan, Giorgio Armani, Calvin Klein, Donatella Versace, Ralph Lauren, Christian Dior, Pierre Cardin and others, who design great female fashions, Sexist Stereotyping too?
I love my friends who may be gay or lesbian, it is my choice. I love them for who they are, how they act towards me and others in our community, what they care about, our common values! However, I do not have to accept their sexual values as mine nor praise those values any more then they have to love my propensity for cayenne pepper in food! Despite differences, I would defend them with my life if anyone should attack them! They are Americans and we all live and stand together or die together. Nevertheless, America started with values, has values, wants values and your telling us that if we don’t change we are sexist bigots is nothing but bullshit. People come to America because of who we are not who you want to remake us into! We have our values, we have our tolerance to differences and we have our pride in this achievement, but we did not ask you or anyone else to rewrite our history. We don’t need revolution after revolution after revolution to make the desires of everyone’s unique psychological issues something to march for! Some of us do believe in God and ultimate values. Those who don’t, atheists who believe in moral relativity (your apparent values) have killed more people in the world than all the “religious wars” in history.
People are not just men, women or gay. People are complex creatures that only God can comprehend. My gay friends are not just “gay.” They are complex people with values, American values, Christian values, ethics, moral values, likes and dislikes which we Americans hold in common; it is what make us a Nation. We Americans are diverse, we accept differences and yet we have a common heritage that we do not want eroded by degenerate Hollywood “celebrities” whose greatest virtues are seen on every counter in “The Inquirer,” “The Examiner” or “People Magazine. Their frequently published values, how many orgies they can attend or how many marriages they have had and when they will be out of drug rehabilitation are not now and never will be mainstream American values. If there are no boundaries as you and they seem to see it, then why are they not advocating for Sharia Law? Oops…. they will be killed by ISIS and the like (I forgot that).
Re-defining America until we have no boundaries is a dangerous goal. We all have a feeling where our boundaries should be though it is hard at times to express in words. This applies to national boundaries as well as moral boundaries. It has been expressed for several hundred years, as America. Yes we righted injustices and refined our viewpoints, but we do not choose to change who we are.
If human sexuality is a spectrum and not a dichotomy as nature appears to present it, then YOU should logically accept all those who believe in God as a spectrum and see no dichotomies or boundaries. With that in mind you should accept as refugees any and all Islamic people who come from ISIS controlled territory without vetting! To not do so would be akin to being sexist; it’s Islamophobic!
Nat Geo, volunteer your homes to all the unvetted islamics now! Why judge them, it’s the Islamic Revolution, support it!
Let’s see how well that goes over…………..Nat Geo!